Interstitial Cognition and the Persistence of Micro-Gap Influence
Prepared for internal review. Print-safe format enabled via stylesheet.
Abstract
We propose that conscious continuity is sampled rather than continuous. Sampling gaps expose transient vulnerability to intention drift. Across 312 observation days, CGW events clustered around transition-rich contexts and specific circadian windows, with downstream memory coherence preserved by PDE backfill mechanisms.
1. Methods
Protocol combined self-report diaries, passive time-series wearables, and scripted transition tasks. Instrument lag was calibrated against synchronized atomic-time services. Report credibility scoring used cross-channel consistency, not self-confidence.
2. Findings
- Doorway thresholds produced the highest repeatable CGW incidence multiplier.
- 03:17 wake perturbation emerged independent of geography and occupation class.
- PDE reconstruction raised certainty while lowering factual recall accuracy.
3. Mitigation Recommendations
Deploy threshold anchors (spoken intent before crossing doorways), enforce timestamped micro-journaling around recurrent ICZ locations, and avoid high-consequence commitments within 15 seconds of detected lapse sensations.
4. Limitations
The archive does not claim origin mechanism. Current model only estimates envelope behavior and post-event signatures. Controlled interruption studies remain ethically constrained.
5. Operational References
Implementation details and checklists are maintained in the Methodology page. Terminology alignment for external readers is available in the Glossary.