Whitepaper ยท TL-RP-26.3

Interstitial Cognition and the Persistence of Micro-Gap Influence

Prepared for internal review. Print-safe format enabled via stylesheet.

Abstract

We propose that conscious continuity is sampled rather than continuous. Sampling gaps expose transient vulnerability to intention drift. Across 312 observation days, CGW events clustered around transition-rich contexts and specific circadian windows, with downstream memory coherence preserved by PDE backfill mechanisms.

1. Methods

Protocol combined self-report diaries, passive time-series wearables, and scripted transition tasks. Instrument lag was calibrated against synchronized atomic-time services. Report credibility scoring used cross-channel consistency, not self-confidence.

2. Findings

CGW incidence by local time

03:17 peak

PDE recovery distribution

3. Mitigation Recommendations

Deploy threshold anchors (spoken intent before crossing doorways), enforce timestamped micro-journaling around recurrent ICZ locations, and avoid high-consequence commitments within 15 seconds of detected lapse sensations.

4. Limitations

The archive does not claim origin mechanism. Current model only estimates envelope behavior and post-event signatures. Controlled interruption studies remain ethically constrained.

5. Operational References

Implementation details and checklists are maintained in the Methodology page. Terminology alignment for external readers is available in the Glossary.